Thursday, January 30, 2020

Diversity of human potential Essay Example for Free

Diversity of human potential Essay Gardner meanwhile developed the concept of multiple intelligences to reflect diversity of what human beings can do. He argued that there aptitudes or different propensities including linguistics, logical-mathematical, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, spatial, interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences. Learning as a social behavior Bandura’s social learning theory extends the concept of the human potential and noted the role of obtaining competencies through the process of response consequences or observational learning which is essentially imitation or modeling. Modeling according to this theory has four components. Attention, the first component is perception of the significant attributes of a particular behavior. Retention is the next component or coding or committing the behavior to memory. Motor reproduction is the ability to reproduce the modeled behavior. The fourth component is motivational or reinforcements – the necessary push to do set of actions associated with the particular behavior (Bandura, 1975). The three basic psychological concepts outlined above just about cover the domain of psychology and points us to the direction that although there are individual competencies or potentials what happened if these individuals co-exists at particular setting. Bandura posited learning would be impossibility without a social setting even assuming the individual has the potential to learn (Bandura, 1962, , 1975). Accounting for variations. Levels of permanence and variability defines features of the individual like body shape which is relatively permanent than mental recognition or perception which could change quickly which may be internal or influenced by external factors. If modeling is a way of learning accounting for changes through time would be the next step, which is progression. In the case of suicide which has very strong negative association Kolb’s experiential learning cycle model would be helpful and may provide an expanded understanding on how groups or social networks form. This is very important as it has been shown modeling or experiencing losing someone because of suicide is a difficult phase which has proven significant as shown by Bearman and Moody, in terms of suicidal ideation or making the person who committed suicide a model figure (Bearman Moody, 2004). Kolb identified four phases which has interesting interrelationships if taken not as phases but states of mind which is simultaneously being processed. Psychological diversity would be immense because of possibilities of dominance of each of the state of minds. Concrete experience (CE) and abstract conceptualization (AC), for example could be taken as off tangent to each other as experience could be taken as activity which is cyclical in itself but abstraction and conceptualization (AC) is progressive. Human potential may have been the same in the past 300 years but the explosion of knowledge because of science and technology what Bruner may call as powerful amplifiers. Reflective observation (RO) and active experimentation (AE) meanwhile in context of CE and AC could explain possible changes or how situations develop. To tie these all up is talking about the process cognition. As applied to understanding of the complex act of committing suicide, we see that actual experience or feeling the pressure from the environment as continuing until the final act. It is easy to understand what clinical psychologist would point out that suicidal tendencies should be seen as a form of mental illness an irrational behavior wherein the mind or the will has ceased to function. Kolb’s model is posited on the positive or rational thinking and development towards a higher plane of competence and learning as the rule or trend of human behavior. But still we could use Kolb’s and others thinking on human development as operative albeit the outcome is generally considered unacceptable. A lot of cases tends to point out there are risky social situations which may push some people into progressive stages until the act of committing suicide. For this we explore the sociological perspectives.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Death Leads To Maturity :: essays research papers

In the entire life cycle of a human being, teenage stage is the fun, memorable, and some time the wild part. In this teenage stage, the teenagers experiment with everything without caring about the consequences. For most people, the life prior to the teenage stage is the most exciting part because there are no worries; every thing is fun. When the teenage life begins, most of their behaviours change while adapting to various habits. They follow good and bad behaviours as the result of influences from their parents, friends, teachers and the society they live in. These behaviours and societal norms combined with enthusiastic nature makes teenagers do various things. The result of their activities gives them the basic knowledge of the real world. Dead Poets Society, by N.H. Kleinbaum, and A Separate Peace, John Knowles, are two novels that focus on the difficult journey towards maturity and the adult world of the teenage boys. They focus on the learning experience of friendship and self esteem through the death of others. Both John Keating and Finny (Phineas) are great leaders who face many difficulties in achieving their goal and often become the victims. Dead Poets Society opens with Keating being a substitute teacher for an English class and encouraging his students to make their lives meaningful and extraordinary by referring to the word â€Å"Carpe Diem† (25). This is the Latin word for seize the Day and he wants them to seek out their dreams and to believe in themselves. Keating believes that education requires the student to think for himself. He must be free to question and to learn in the way that he learns best. A Separate Peace opens with Finny being portrayed as a brave sixteen years old boy who strongly believes in and encourages other students in his class to act upon their wishes. Both characters are optimistic about making a change in other people’s lives to make them better. Keating encourages the students to write poems to express their feelings. Finny on the other hand, encourages his friends to skip classes and do wild things like jumping off the tree. Neil, one of Keating’s students, follows his wishes and disobeys his father. At the end, Neil kills himself when his father decides to take him out of school. Yet Keating is blamed for Neil’s death and is expelled from his position. The persistent theme of A Separate Peace is the fall of a complex friendship.

Monday, January 13, 2020

Oedipus Rex

The Oral Presentation gave me a clear idea about how and what the author was trying to convey through his book. Not being from the time period at which the play was written made it difficult to interpret what Sophocles was trying to portray. Even though the presentation clarified most of my questions, I was still left pondering certain aspects of Oedipus Rex. In the book, the main question for me was if Oedipus really had control of his life or what he being controlled by the gods and fate. When Oedipus heard the prophecy for the first time, he tried to run away from it.That gives me inkling on Oedipus that tells me he believes in the prophecy and it will come to pass. When he really does kill his father without knowing and later tried to find the killer he says â€Å"Now my curse on the murderer. Whowever he is, a lone man unknown in his crime or one among many let that man drag out his life in agony† (Sophocles, 280 – 283). In reality he places that curse on himself a nd he really did spend the rest of his life in pain and agony as well as exile. In the presentation it shows the respect Greeks gave to the gods and elder as well as to their advice and wisdom.Also since they respected the gods, who were almighty, would punish you if you resisted their will. In the book it shows that because Oedipus killed his father, the plague started and until there has been justice and the man caught for the crime, the plague will keep killing people. In the presentation, it showed us that the plague was active during the time the play was written and it transfers over to the book because the author is trying to tell us that people were losing faith and thus causing plague which scared people to pin their hope on some higher power.In the book the chorus says that â€Å"great laws tower above us† (Sophocles, 957) which shows that people considered gods as the greatest Justice. That proves the fact that they respect the gods at the highest of level. This ma kes me want to learn more about their belief as well as what the prophecy meant to them. I also want to learn more about how the belief affected their everyday life and thoughts as well. That ends my thought on what I have learned from the presentation. The reflective essay also helped clear my thoughts on what I had learned from the presentation and sort out the facts. Oedipus Rex It is edifice alt to decide whether there should be a set criteria for a hero; professors use one man's SST ROR as a basis for questioning: Oedipus Rexes. Sophocles' play explores the adventures of a man and his actions, and how the two affected the way his life ended. He carried out m cost of Aristotle requirements for a highhanded man, including his pursuit of truth and a high stance in society. A key factor in his life was one that did not meet the standards, however: his I ace of good fortune.His tale challenges readers to brood over some important questions: What is a hero, and is it actions or fate that decides? One of the most important concepts Aristotle focuses on is one's good fortune e. He claims that, ‘The gifts of good fortune also are commonly thought to contribute to hi kindnesses. For those who are well born are thought worthy of honor,† (Witt, 160). A person that is highhanded generally has good things happen to him. Aristotle idea is mode irately accurat e; Decoys 2 people that aim for integrity usually encounter positive outcomes.Although it is out of his control, Oedipus fails to meet Aristotle standards in this division. The entire y of his bad luck is displayed during the final Antiheroes of the story: Ah Situation!†¦ When I was cast upon you, why did I not die?†¦ Then should never have shown the world my execrable birth†¦ My own blood, spilled by my own hand†¦ O marriage, marriage! That act that engendered me, and again the e act performed by the son in the same bed†¦ God hates me†¦ (Witt, 128) As Oedipus physically blinds himself, he finally reveals the truth about his life. Acknowledges being cursed as a baby and led to the land of Situation out of p tit, and the horrific actions he went on to commit thereafter; he ended up fulfilling his destiny Of murdering his father and sleeping with his mother. His whole life is spent running from the c ruse that was lain upon him, but fate brought him strai ght to it. Oedipus' unruly behavior is due to his lack of good fortune and the unmovable hand of fate. According to Aristotle, a highhanded man's fate tends to be positive, therefore making him more worthy of honor.In Oedipus' case, he lost all sense of respect once his true identity was revealed, making him a step below Aristotle ‘s specifications in this area. Aristotle also portrays the ideal man as one who values and strives for the true the. In â€Å"The Highhanded Man† he states, â€Å"He must care for the truth more than for what en will think of him, and speak and act openly. He will not hesitate to say what he thinks,† (Wi TTT, 160). The man described here is constant in his beliefs and is not afraid to make them know n, no matter what the consequences are.This is an extremely important virtue for any person to have, because one cannot truly believe in anything if he/ she does not believe in themselves enough to speak openly. Oedipus exhibits this trait during his conversation with his wife's brother Kerr Decoys 3 You murderer! Do you think I do not know that you plotted to kill me†¦ Am I†¦ A fool, that you should dream you could accomplish this?†¦ Thrones may be won or bought: you could do neither. (Witt, 116) This passage occurs after Terrifies admits his knowledge of Oedipus' past. Up on his return, the outraged king accuses Akron of attempting to steal his throne.Oedipus, of co ruse, is wrong in his accusations, but his underlying motive is to discover the truth. His search for answers overcame his fear of losing Akron as a friend. This selfless act would be considered as hi shinnied according to Aristotle standards. High social stature is another characteristic that a man must possess in order to be considered as highhanded. In Aristotle words, â€Å"The highhanded man, then, respect of the greatness of his deserts occupies an extreme position,† (Witt, 159). A man can not be regarded as highhanded unless his position in society is high, as well.Although there are many locals, honorable men, it is nearly impossible for one to be noticed as such without b Ewing relatively famous. Oedipus is welkin, for he holds the most important rank in the cit y, as he states in the beginning of the tragedy: â€Å"†¦ L have come myself to hear you l, Oedipus, who o bears the famous name,† (Witt, 110). In this passage, the king is addressing the people o f his city regarding their wishes to speak to him. Aristotle states that a highhanded ma n must be great in all ways, including his social status.As a fractals king, Oedipus fits this part o f Aristotle criteria perfectly. Oedipus exhibits many of the qualities Aristotle literature â€Å"The Highhanded Man† requires, despite his lack of good fortune. Looking into the origins of the mod render hero allows one to ponder about his or her own morality. Oedipus was an Larson d admirable man; he appealed to the people, sought justice, an d applied punishment where it w as deserved even Decoys 4 against himself. The wrongs he committed unknowingly were seemingly Univac addable, and every eve he made in between was aimed at goodness. Oedipus Rex The Oral Presentation gave me a clear idea about how and what the author was trying to convey through his book. Not being from the time period at which the play was written made it difficult to interpret what Sophocles was trying to portray. Even though the presentation clarified most of my questions, I was still left pondering certain aspects of Oedipus Rex. In the book, the main question for me was if Oedipus really had control of his life or what he being controlled by the gods and fate. When Oedipus heard the prophecy for the first time, he tried to run away from it.That gives me inkling on Oedipus that tells me he believes in the prophecy and it will come to pass. When he really does kill his father without knowing and later tried to find the killer he says â€Å"Now my curse on the murderer. Whowever he is, a lone man unknown in his crime or one among many let that man drag out his life in agony† (Sophocles, 280 – 283). In reality he places that curse on himself a nd he really did spend the rest of his life in pain and agony as well as exile. In the presentation it shows the respect Greeks gave to the gods and elder as well as to their advice and wisdom.Also since they respected the gods, who were almighty, would punish you if you resisted their will. In the book it shows that because Oedipus killed his father, the plague started and until there has been justice and the man caught for the crime, the plague will keep killing people. In the presentation, it showed us that the plague was active during the time the play was written and it transfers over to the book because the author is trying to tell us that people were losing faith and thus causing plague which scared people to pin their hope on some higher power.In the book the chorus says that â€Å"great laws tower above us† (Sophocles, 957) which shows that people considered gods as the greatest Justice. That proves the fact that they respect the gods at the highest of level. This ma kes me want to learn more about their belief as well as what the prophecy meant to them. I also want to learn more about how the belief affected their everyday life and thoughts as well. That ends my thought on what I have learned from the presentation. The reflective essay also helped clear my thoughts on what I had learned from the presentation and sort out the facts. Oedipus Rex It is edifice alt to decide whether there should be a set criteria for a hero; professors use one man's SST ROR as a basis for questioning: Oedipus Rexes. Sophocles' play explores the adventures of a man and his actions, and how the two affected the way his life ended. He carried out m cost of Aristotle requirements for a highhanded man, including his pursuit of truth and a high stance in society. A key factor in his life was one that did not meet the standards, however: his I ace of good fortune.His tale challenges readers to brood over some important questions: What is a hero, and is it actions or fate that decides? One of the most important concepts Aristotle focuses on is one's good fortune e. He claims that, ‘The gifts of good fortune also are commonly thought to contribute to hi kindnesses. For those who are well born are thought worthy of honor,† (Witt, 160). A person that is highhanded generally has good things happen to him. Aristotle idea is mode irately accurat e; Decoys 2 people that aim for integrity usually encounter positive outcomes.Although it is out of his control, Oedipus fails to meet Aristotle standards in this division. The entire y of his bad luck is displayed during the final Antiheroes of the story: Ah Situation!†¦ When I was cast upon you, why did I not die?†¦ Then should never have shown the world my execrable birth†¦ My own blood, spilled by my own hand†¦ O marriage, marriage! That act that engendered me, and again the e act performed by the son in the same bed†¦ God hates me†¦ (Witt, 128) As Oedipus physically blinds himself, he finally reveals the truth about his life. Acknowledges being cursed as a baby and led to the land of Situation out of p tit, and the horrific actions he went on to commit thereafter; he ended up fulfilling his destiny Of murdering his father and sleeping with his mother. His whole life is spent running from the c ruse that was lain upon him, but fate brought him strai ght to it. Oedipus' unruly behavior is due to his lack of good fortune and the unmovable hand of fate. According to Aristotle, a highhanded man's fate tends to be positive, therefore making him more worthy of honor.In Oedipus' case, he lost all sense of respect once his true identity was revealed, making him a step below Aristotle ‘s specifications in this area. Aristotle also portrays the ideal man as one who values and strives for the true the. In â€Å"The Highhanded Man† he states, â€Å"He must care for the truth more than for what en will think of him, and speak and act openly. He will not hesitate to say what he thinks,† (Wi TTT, 160). The man described here is constant in his beliefs and is not afraid to make them know n, no matter what the consequences are.This is an extremely important virtue for any person to have, because one cannot truly believe in anything if he/ she does not believe in themselves enough to speak openly. Oedipus exhibits this trait during his conversation with his wife's brother Kerr Decoys 3 You murderer! Do you think I do not know that you plotted to kill me†¦ Am I†¦ A fool, that you should dream you could accomplish this?†¦ Thrones may be won or bought: you could do neither. (Witt, 116) This passage occurs after Terrifies admits his knowledge of Oedipus' past. Up on his return, the outraged king accuses Akron of attempting to steal his throne.Oedipus, of co ruse, is wrong in his accusations, but his underlying motive is to discover the truth. His search for answers overcame his fear of losing Akron as a friend. This selfless act would be considered as hi shinnied according to Aristotle standards. High social stature is another characteristic that a man must possess in order to be considered as highhanded. In Aristotle words, â€Å"The highhanded man, then, respect of the greatness of his deserts occupies an extreme position,† (Witt, 159). A man can not be regarded as highhanded unless his position in society is high, as well.Although there are many locals, honorable men, it is nearly impossible for one to be noticed as such without b Ewing relatively famous. Oedipus is welkin, for he holds the most important rank in the cit y, as he states in the beginning of the tragedy: â€Å"†¦ L have come myself to hear you l, Oedipus, who o bears the famous name,† (Witt, 110). In this passage, the king is addressing the people o f his city regarding their wishes to speak to him. Aristotle states that a highhanded ma n must be great in all ways, including his social status.As a fractals king, Oedipus fits this part o f Aristotle criteria perfectly. Oedipus exhibits many of the qualities Aristotle literature â€Å"The Highhanded Man† requires, despite his lack of good fortune. Looking into the origins of the mod render hero allows one to ponder about his or her own morality. Oedipus was an Larson d admirable man; he appealed to the people, sought justice, an d applied punishment where it w as deserved even Decoys 4 against himself. The wrongs he committed unknowingly were seemingly Univac addable, and every eve he made in between was aimed at goodness. Oedipus Rex Sophocles in Oedipus Rex introduces the horrors of veracity through the journey the tragic hero Oedipus takes on. This tragedy encompasses all the concepts of Aristotle’s Poetics in regards to a complex plot. According to Aristotle, a tragedy is an event that has to arouse pity and fear to the readers; Oedipus contains all the features of this demand. In terms of Oedipus’ tragedy, he’s seen as the cursed one who consequently has to suffer the tragic repercussions of fate. In Sophocles’s Oedipus Rex, destiny persecutes Oedipus as it demonstrates elements such as his hubris that is exemplified through his behavior, his tragic flaws that is hamartia and the reversal of his tragic discovery that leads him to fulfill the prophecy. In Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex, the author depicts Oedipus’ tragic flaw of hubris through his kingship in Thebes. His pride qualifies as Aristotle’s concept of a tragic character. Aristotle’s tragic character is defined as a character that must occupy a high status and also embody virtues. Aristotle defines Oedipus’ hubris as â€Å"his excessive pride that causes the hero to ignore a divine warning break of moral law† (Aristotle 43). Oedipus is confident about solving the murder of king Laius. His character’s self-belief is exemplified through this quote; â€Å"by the mouth of messengers, I have myself came hither, Oedipus, known far and wide by name (Sophocles 1)†. This demonstrates how Oedipus is confident in his popularity, because he was the one who solved the Sphinx’s riddle and therefore believes that he deserves immediate respect and recognition. Oedipus illustrates himself as being the only intelligent one in all of Thebes, â€Å"with [his] readiness to afford all aid; hard hearted must [he] be (Sophocles 1)†. This passage clearly exhibits his arrogance as it also clarifies his hubris, which, in in end, leads to his downfall. Furthermore, he speaks to people in a pretentious manner; â€Å"what you come see is known already – not unknown to me (Sophocles 3)†. This once again acts as an addition to Aristotle’s concept of hubris. Oedipus permits himself to freely behave with a highly conceded attitude that is exemplified through â€Å"Come to each singly; by at my once groans for the city, and for myself, and you,† (Sophocles 3). The structure of this quote indicates Oedipus’ high attitude towards the problems that dawn upon Thebes. Instead of showing his audience that his primary concerns re of himself, his focus is the security of the town. In doing so, it displays the tenacity of his pride and thinking he can save the city of Thebes by himself, yet also displaying his dedication, which can be seen as a heroic quality: â€Å"I [am] confident, nor prone to fear (Sophocles 4)†. His hubris is once again exemplified when questioning the blind man, Tiresias. This man is known to only speak the truth, and when threatened by Oedipus to express that knowledge about the murder, it leads to a tragedy, rather than enlightenment, in this plot. Tiresias reveals the truth to Oedipus because of his perseverance in uncovering the truth. As he lets his hubris blurry his sight by believing he was lied to by Tiresisas and Creon because he thinks he is too virtuous to have committed such actions. Oedipus rejects all possibilities of such and rather refers to it as a plan to try and throw him off his reign: â€Å"For you would rouse a very stone to wrath – will you not speak out ever but stand thus relentless and persistent (Sophocles 13)†. This passage shows that there is a lingering fear within the king’s mind. He uses the excuse that they are trying to overthrow him because he was the one who solved the riddle of the sphinx, which potentially means they were jealous of his position. Oedipus believes that by tricking him, they would reign over Thebes. Oedipus’ negligence in accepting responsibility, along with his surplus of pride leads to his refusal in accepting the truth and instead opts to blame others. Tiresias tells him â€Å" you censure; but your own, at home, you see not, and blame me! Sophocles 13)†: this shows that Tiresias has had it with Oedipus’ hubris and him not being able to accept the truth, foreshadowing that Oedipus’ greatness is a tragic harbinger of his fall. Oedipus pushed himself into his fate which destruction is brought upon him through his ruthless means and arrogance. Oedipus’ hubris is portrayed through his thoughts, words and actions which eventua lly begin to work against him. Oedipus’ egoism leads him to think that he is perfect in everything, however, his superior attitude leads him to what Aristotle defines as one of the key points of a tragedy; hamartia. Aristotle’s meaning of hamartia is defined as â€Å"the change of fortune should be not from bad to good, reversely from good to bad. It should come about as the result not of vice, but of some great error or frailty in a character either such as we have described or better rather than worse (Aristotle 23). In Oedipus’ case, hamarita is seen when he wants to know the truth but also plays a role in leading to his downfall . The notion of hamartia is seen during Oedipus’ discussion with Tiresias: when the blind prophet reveals the truth to him. Oedipus disagrees with Tiresias’ statement, as he proclaims, â€Å"For I shall not be found a murderer (Sophocles 21)†. This passage indicates that he can’t be seen as the man who has killed the former king, although his determined search for the truth will uncover to him that that is exactly what he is. Because of this discussion, Tiresias abandons the scene thereby leaving Oedipus alone in his frustration, â€Å"this be the last time I shall gaze on thee, who am revealed to have nee born of those of whom I ought not – to have wedded whom I ought to be – and slain who I might not slay! (Sophocles 42)†. Oedipus believes he has evaded fate, but ironically he has fulfilled everything the oracle had explained to him, and it is is hamartia, his search for the truth that has pushed him to these realizations. Subsequently, he consults his wife Jocasta by telling her that Tiresias condemned him and revealed his prophecy. Jocasta, already knowing the truth, attempts to persuade him by giving up his search. However, because of his hamartia, Oedipus does not stop his search he continues with his attempts at finding out the truth about the prophecy of him killing his father and sleeping with his mother. This is seen as Oedipus’ annoyance of the truth, â€Å"more miserable than I am? Who on earth could have been born with more of hate from heaven? (Sophocles 29)†. This passage shows Oedipus’ realization that perhaps the prophet was right. â€Å"I am at the horror (Sophocles 41)†, indicates that Oedipus, beginning to panic, decides to consult the old man who knows the events. His hamartia is that which compels him to do so. However, the prophet refuses to say anything, so Oedipus says, â€Å"tell me the whole truth, or you will come to it! (Sophocles 41)†. Oedipus is once again arrogant in discovering the truth, but still seeks it. The old man, threatened for his life, begins to tell the tale of the patricide, â€Å"†¦and I hear. But I must hear – no less (Sophocles 41)†. The truth is out there now; Oedipus has uncovered the mystery of the murderer. It is Oedipus’ actions that bring things into motion, but it is his fate, pride and his hamartia, as he relentlessly wants the truth, that lead him to his downfall. Oedipus’ ignorance comes from his fear concerning the appalling horror of the possible truth and its devastating implications. This falls into the category of Aristotle’s concept in what makes a good tragedy; peripeteia. Aristotle defines it as the â€Å"reversal of the situation [which] is a change by which the action veers round to its opposite† (Aristotle 20). This concept is the reversal of a situation, which is the transition from ignorance to knowledge. The situations encompass scenes of suffering and of painful actions. In Oedipus’ case, his downfall is where he finally realizes that his prophecy of â€Å"self-slain† (Sophocles 44) was predestined to occur. Peripeteia, necessary for a complex plot, occurs when he realizes this, as we see in that quote. By this truth being actually understood, all consequences fall into place for Oedipus. First off, Jocasta, Oedipus’ wife and mother, knew the truth about Oedipus all along; she even pierced his tendons when he was younger so he couldn’t run away when she put him in a forest. After she found out that Oedipus discovered the truth, she locked herself in the bedroom alone and hung herself, â€Å"for whom it was impossible to watch, the ending of her misery (Sophocles 45)†. Oedipus is slowly introduced to the miseries of this truth; â€Å"say where he could find his wife – no wife, rather the [dead-corpse] of his mother (Sophocles 45)†. With his mother/wife dead, he could no longer handle the outcome of what his life came to be, so he no longer knows how to act, and is compelled to doing the most extreme of actions: â€Å"what followed; snatching from her dress gold pins wherewith she was adorned, he lifted them, and smote the nerves of his own eyeballs, saying that they should see no more (Sophocles 45)†. Oedipus could not put up with the realization; so instead, he opted to remove his sight. He could no longer bear the physical world and chose to focus on the psychological torment that accompanies the contemplation of the truth: â€Å"What deity was it that with a leap so great – farther than farthest – sprang on thy sad fate? Woe is me, woe is me for thee – unfortunate! (Sophocles 46)†. As blood is shrieking out of his eyes, he blinds himself in agony, demonstrating that nothing is worse than looking at the miserable truth. The irony is that even though he no longer has sight; he can now finally see the truth of the prophecy. As said when he was king, whoever the murderer was to be exiled from Thebes, so in order to fulfill this statement, he asks Creon, the new king â€Å"lead me to exile straight; Lead me, O my friends, the worst of murderers, or mortals most accurst, yea and to Gods chief object of their hate. (Sophocles 48)†. In addition to the demand of exile, he also asks Creon to take care of his daughters, as he can no longer bear the sight f them: â€Å"Knowing what is left of bitter in the life which at men’s hands you needs must henceforth live (Sophocles 53)†. This shows that Oedipus is talking to his daughters and telling them the truth, which is that no one will want to marry them because they were born from an incestuous marriage and because of this, they will be excluded from this society: the horrors of his actions cease to stop. Oedipus is then exiled from the city, expressing â€Å"to Gods, above all men, I am a mark for hat (Sophocles 53)†. Oedipus loses his sight and family, exiled from the city of Thebes, but gains the truth and lives in humility. Oedipus’ hubris was a mixture of rage and pride that unfortunately was possessed. The Greeks believed that this sin was grave and one of the most dangerous because people with such pride thought that they were above the Gods. Seeing that Oedipus’ arrogance is so strong as a consequent it led to his downfall. Therefore the result of hubris led him to a tragic fate. It is only when Oedipus’ plucks out his eyes that he returns to a human state. Oedipus’ character brings out his hubris, hamartia and recognition that enable it to fit under the concept of Aristotle’s complex plot.

Sunday, January 5, 2020

The Attack on Pearl Harbor and its Effects on the War - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 11 Words: 3360 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/06/17 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Pearl Harbor Essay World War 2 Essay Did you like this example? Imagine your average Sunday morning. For the sailors in the Naval Fleet stationed at Pearl Harbor it was an average Sunday. Everyone dressed in their pressed white shorts, a white t-shirt, and a sailors hat. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Attack on Pearl Harbor and its Effects on the War" essay for you Create order While out in the Pacific the Japanese Armada gathered, the force consisted of six aircraft carriers, two battleships, two heavy cruisers, and many more forces to aid the attack. This was definitely a planned sneak attack, meant to hurt our navy/military. This attack did catch us off-guard, but they unleashed a sleeping beast. This paper will be about the strategic plan in the western front and the pacific. Also, how men and women and kids all stood up together and all did their part in the war effort overseas and on the Homefront. The patriotism for the American people after the attack is just mind blowing. Just how one substantial event can move a whole nation is mind boggling, and for the mind of a human I dont understand how everyone just came together when imagining it in todays world. With all the things going on in the world and country today I do believe there is still that fight in everyone that is willing to stand up for our country and defend her. The cost of freedom isnt cheap and there are still many good people willing to fight for her and defend her with everything they have including their life. The prime example is the attack on 9/11 and how many kids from that generation who remember it and witnessed it stood up and enlisted in the military. Many of the men and women in the military are part of the generation that witnessed this attack and they decided to enlist due to this attack and do their part in defending our country. To imagine there are kids my age everyday going into harms way to defe nd our country in very humbling and I am very proud to have them on my side in this war. The attack crippled the naval fleet and the US Navy, it destroyed roughly 20 ships and 300 airplanes. More important 2,403 sailors, soldiers and civilians were killed in this is devastating to most Americans to hear due to America attempting to stay neutral in the war, but Japan felt different. This was basically a bloody invitation to go head to head with a well-trained and highly dedicated military in the pacific. For the men who enlisted I have nothing but respect for them, they had no clue what they were getting into, but they stepped up. This is a true show of patriotism, and it makes me wonder if something like this happened today if I could do the same. After the attack the newspapers filled with beliefs of Japanese invading Guam and Philippines. The enlistment craze was the scare of the nation falling to some other country and just pure patriotism. The recruiting offices were jammed pack in all rural areas and men were signing up to go to the war effort, kids started collecti ng scrap metal to make bullets and tanks and planes for the war overseas. Women took over men jobs and showed true feminism in my eyes. They showed they were just as good as men, and I believe they deserve just as much respect as the men some. The men went into areas of war that changed them forever and even lost their lives. One man was in high school months after the attack and the spring of 1942 he was afraid the war was going to be over, and as soon as possible he joined the Army Air Corps. This is just one story of many just alike that will happen, and many men will go into the military and even be under age or not meet requirements but that will not stop them to go to war. This also brought up the draft so every man between the ages 18 to 65 had to sign up for the draft. Over 12 percent of the US population was enlisted, well over 16 million men and women were in the armed forces during this period. With the war this also brought up rationing books and many people would have t o go to food banks to get food with everything going on in the US they had so many downfalls to the country but as a country we had to suffer but, in the end, it worked out. The home front of the war was very different from the day before the attack and the day after. This is a huge change, this would affect many kids as well as their dads and brothers and moms all had to start very different lives, even the kids themselves had to help. Think of being a 9-year-old kid and instead of playing your searching the streets for any metal you can find to recycle for bullets and just everything. Hollywood stars, radio stars, and musicians all enlisted and helped on the home front. As America grew stronger every day on the Homefront the men and women of the armed forces all prepared for war, this war would be completely different from all wars as they will be fighting on two fronts. The western front in the west over in Europe, and in the Eastern front, in the pacific. The pacific to me is very interesting, with the type of battles they encountered and tactics the Japanese used in the conflicts. While in the western front they faced huge enemy bases, and huge bunk ers that would have 200 enemy soldiers fortified. Lets get back to the Eastern front imagine it being the hottest day you have ever felt and add 98% humidity all while packing gear, and any moment your best friend could fall into a booby trap and then a whole little fight breaks out for 2 hours and you get pushed back only to never recover your friend. That would mentally mess with a mans mind as you have the time to set and think about it after all the fighting was done. The battle in the Pacific had to be strategically planned and all movement and footsteps had to be strategically placed due to the potential of death at every footstep. Due to the dense forestry and the enemy fighting in that terrain for many years. Mainly the Marines and the Navy was in the pacific while mostly the Army, Coast Guard, and the Air Force was on the Western front. Lets begin with the Battle of Midway, this was mainly a naval fleet battle between the two competing naval fleets. The battle begun June 3 through the 6th of 1942, and this was mainly fought with aircraft. The battle cost the Imperial army some of their best pilots, and also their ships. The battle began on June 3, 1942, when U.S. bombers from Midway Island struck ineffectually at the Japanese invasion force about 220 miles southwest of the U.S. fleet. Early the next morning Japanese planes from the strike force attacked and bombed Midway heavily, while the Japanese carriers escaped damage from U.S. land-based planes. (Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.). . This battle became one of the most famous battles in the pacific with it being only 3 days. A lot happened in the 3 days this battle lasted . When talking about the battle in the Pacific many people dont understand just how vital this was to the war effort in a whole. The Pacific is a vital naval asset to the war and whomever ran the Pacific basically had control of the war in the Pacific and so on. While out in the water in the ocean and any moment you could have Kamikaze attacks or a enemy submarine shoot torpedoes and theres nothing in this time frame you can do but be prepared and try to fight them off. The war in the Pacific has always intrigued me due to the fighting style of both sides and how they took on the war. The Japanese were more guerilla while the Americans were like patrols and vehicle like Gentlemens Army proper. The best way to describe the war in the Pacific from an American view that I can think of is terrifying. Every day you just walk in the jungle or a ruined city and any moment all hell break loose and half your patrol is wiped out and you have nothing but the gear youre carrying to protect yourself. Many kids my age (18) would not have the capacity mentally to do the things these men did, including me I personally do not know what I would do in some of the situations these men went through. This fighting style could tie back into the Revolutionary War and how that fighting style has just proven to be effective against the opposing force. For example guerilla warfare is one of the most effective ways to fight an army whom sticks to rules of war. While many never thought of tying in the two wars it actually is very similar just flipped roles, the US forces were the gentlemens army and the Japanese were the guerilla warriors. The pacific strategy for both sides was very coordinated and more thorough then many people will ever comprehend. Think about it there are roughly couple thousand miles in between our mainland and Japan, this is very unfortunate and is a huge part that many historians mention. There were many scares on the west coast of the US and how the coast was just so on edge and everyone was waiting for the west coast to become like England and be bombed nightly by the Japanese bombers. One scare was the Battle of Los Angeles, this was just an event to be cause by the tense feeling of the US and the attacks from the Japanese. In the frantic weeks that followed the Pearl Harbor attack, many Americans believed that enemy raids on the continental United States were imminent. On December 9, 1941, unsubstantiated reports of approaching aircraft had caused a minor invasion panic in New York City and sent stock prices tumbling. On the West Coast, inexperienced pilots and radar men had mistaken fishing boats, logs and even whales for Japanese warships and submarines. Tensions were high, and they only grew after U.S. Secretary of War Henry Stimson warned that American cities should be prepared to accept occasional blows from enemy forces.. This statement from this source just shows how on edge the coast was and the fact that the US actually was scared at one point of being attacked shows that even the superpowers have the constant fear of being attacked and knocked down. Which our country was knocked down for that day and night, but we stood up and took up for ourselves. One point of this war after the attack was solely based on just scare tactics and the coast and to believe that the city of Los Angeles was son edge and the fact they basically unleashed hell on the sky in the middle of the night just shows how seriously but almost to quickly we acted on that scare. The Amphibious landing on the islands of Japan were brutal, they were basically mimicking the storming of the Eastern front. They had special landing crafts for the islands and the sandy beaches, for six months the US forces fought to keep the islands. You may think six months is short compared to the whole war but six months fighting just for islands in the Pacific took its toll on the US forces. Many men will get dehydrated from the high humidity and heat, and become very weathered down might I say from all the moving and basically living off rations which is not substantial long term. These Islands were a huge deal for the Naval fighter pilots whom would use the islands for air bases to refuel and have a halfway marker from main island of Japan. This also introduced the terms of Tunnel Rats men who would crawl into tiny holes the Japanese used to maneuver through the dense jungle. The fighting conditions down there were unforgiven and many men would fall victim to them tunnels. Al so there was a ne term called Island hopping introduced to where Allies would skip over heavily defended islands for the lightly defended islands to make it easier for the invading forces. This is a smart but also kind of bad idea because then youre basically just putting opposing forts close together and waiting for one to attack the other. And with how quickly both sides could attack it was only a matter of days before either force would unleash hell on the other. On the finally of the war in the Pacific there was a top-secret mission to create a super bomb. This would start a controversial topic in the US history of war and death of civilians. The Manhattan Project was kept secret from the general public for a reason, there is a elite group of scientist creating a bomb that will wipe out thousands of civilians and cause lifetime defects of people and possibly affect their kids. The two scientist who basically warned the US was Einstein and Enrico Fermi both whom fled Nazi persecution and felt that the Allies needed to know that the Axis powers had technology that in thir hands will definitely win the war for them. This information caused the US to begin the Manhattan Project, this was an 100 ton bomb with nuclear technology that will basically denigrate humans and anything that has flesh. The first nuclear bomb was set off in May 1945 at the Trinity Site. There was an estimated 2 billion dollars spent on this project and in that time period t hat is just a huge amount of money and to think of how many of these bombs they actually made will never be known and where they are kept is a scary thought. The project though did employ 120,000 Americans, and this was a huge boost in the economy in that area and helped out the American dream. The main scientist behind the bomb was Robert Oppenheimer and he was just brilliant minded and for just one man to be the head of so much destruction is just crazy to think he created a bomb that will easily wipe out a whole city in the matter of minutes. A few months later the biggest decision in the US military command at this time would be made, and the decision would be to drop the atomic bomb in two crucial points in the mainland of Japan. In the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, these were two major cities that when dropped the bombs would obliterate the city and their occupants. Humanely this will make you question if this was the right choice because innocent kids were killed and innocent men and women. Im sure there were people opposed to the war were killed over there and for many years people who lived the bomb would suffer from radiation poisoning and become very sick and many would end up getting to much radiations and begin having cancer and it was so bad they would die very quickly from the bomb. Imagine 100 tons of nuclear energy coming from a plane thousands of feet in the sky they are firing like crazy into the sky to shoot down the US plane but all the sudden you see the mushroom cloud and the extreme wind pressure heading your way destroying everything in its path and youre right in its way. In future years this topic will become a huge discussion in a lot of humane discussions. And many will agree that they think it was a wrong decision humanely, but that to finish the war that it was necessary, personally I see where both sides come from and I just have a hard time choosing a side and wish there were more options to go off of and to ask everyone who chose the decision why they chose it and just all the facts and stuff to fully understand. During the end of the war both sides were ready for the war to be over. The Axis powers still have not found out the full nuclear energy for an atomic bomb figured out but the Allies have, and they implemented the bomb in the end of the war. They had the Enola Gay an US bomber who carried the Atomic bomb to bomb the two cities and the bomber was named after the pilots mother. This would be the deciding factor in the ending of the war and ended up causing the Japanese to surrender in the war. This was due to the bombs being dropped and the massive casualty rate of the bomb dropping. Many people believe the Bombs were inhumane but thats their decision and for the men who chose to drop the bombs are the one whom have to live with it, but they will always know they had the right intentions in mind of stopping the war. The war was just so prolonged and especially being so considerably close to WW1 The Great War many people just wanted the wars to stop, and the world have somewhat peace wh ich is reasonable. There is no doubt in my mind the men who made the decision to drop the bomb had the best in mind knowing what would be caused and the casualty rate. The atomic bombs may seem like they are completely off topic from the war in the pacific and the attack on Pearl Harbor but there is a simple connection. The attack on Pearl Harbor was a small large scale attack, and strategic attack from the Japanese to cripple the US. But the attack just united the American people to group together all ages and all sexes and races to come as one and just basically unleash a large can of American Whoop ass. Sorry for the profanity but that is the best way I can put it and to say we didnt do all we could for the war would be an understatement. All groups of people were helping from women going to work in factories or kids collectings cans from the streets to recycle for bullets and just anything that could be used. Also the fact they sacrificed food for the military shows the true effort and support the US had for the war and just to know people use ration books to keep track to make sure they didnt consume to much food is wild because now a days we would never think of rationing food to help out our military because were so used to have a large amount of extra food and just goods to support us daily. On average I spend 200 dollars on groceries a month and some will last me for months and some for days, and to think they had only a set amount to live off of is hard for me to imagine. I got off track from the similar attributes of the attack on Pearl Harbor and how it was a major point in WW2, the attack just had so many effects on the military and the US. From the battle of Los Angeles and the coast worried they would be bombed nightly. To the strategic planning of the two militaries and the importances of the Islands and how the US would use island hopping and avoid the heavily defended islands. To Einstein and Fermi giving vital information about the Axis powers working on the nuclear bomb and Oppenheimer creating the first nuclear bomb and how that would be a turning point in just world history. The affect of the attack on Pearl Harbor will have a lasting impression on history of the world and the way the world works forever, and no one will ever think of it because of the li ttle wrinkles in the timeline that just basically cover up the fact of where they all began, on that what was seemed to be a peaceful Sunday morning, but turned into one of the deadliest attacks from a foreign military in US military history.